I was asked this week for some thoughts on a video buying decision - specifically whether I would be tempted to opt for a camcorder or a DSLR. This is a great question that almost always ends up in a heated debate, as entrenched advocates for each stand their corner and refuse to give ground.

In the past, I think it's fair to say that DSLRs had some fairly fundamental disadvantages when it came to recording video. Inadequate audio functionality, different codec, no HD resolution, non-standard frame rate, no real-time output, no zebras, no white balance, no peaking, no waveform monitor - the list went on. Now, though, I reckon all of those issues have been addressed, to the point where you can make a choice based purely on what you want your camera to do.

There's an interesting video here (I say 'interesting' rather than 'good' because I disagree with some elements and I think others are out of date) that at least makes a stab at an objective comparison between the two. I think what we all need to focus on, though, are the specific features we need, and how we intend to use the camera.

The big advantages of the DSLR are built around its large sensor. Add on the appropriate lenses, and you can get a very filming looking shallow depth of field and low light performance that no comparably priced video camera is going to be able to match. If that's the most important aspect of your filming, then I'd suggest a DSLR is the best option. You'll need to put a little more time into setting up your shots, but if you have that time (reliably) then you'll be fine. Be prepared, though, to add better lenses (the stock lens is almost never going to deliver on the low light potential of the sensor), ND filters, a handle, a viewfinder, a shoulder mount, an XLR adapter and more.

On the other hand, if getting the shot reliably and quickly in fast changing environments is more important, or having to set up quickly from shot to shot, or having all the video and audio features you need built into a single package, then I think a dedicated video camera is a better bet. You simply have more flexibility. Even doing something as simple as a power zoom while filming - something you'd probably take for granted - would fill me with dread on a DSLR. Also, for most applications, it's a huge advantage to be able to monitor the audio you're recording; I've yet to see a DSLR that allows you to do this.

Every camera has its limitations, unless you have huge amounts of money to throw at it (which is a limitation in itself I suppose), and a huge part of successful videography is being able to work around those limitations. I regularly use both a conventional video camera and a DSLR, using each in different situations according to the task and the type of look I'm trying to create. In addition, I'll also happily use a hand-held camcorder and even an iPhone on occasion - you can get fantastic results from any of these products once you accept and understand their strengths and weaknesses.